Does Boston really need a Mayor?
Mar 03, 2008 14:03
Tom Keane
asks this question. His reasons for a
"no" answer ignore many of the real powers the
mayor has, powers over taxes and development, whom
to subsidize, whom to serve, whom to hire. In
fact, City Hall is full of non-Civil Service
hacks, hired as "temporary" or "provisional"
employees at his constant whim. The departing
library director cited Menino's hiring pressure.
Keane says that politics is passe, and Menino's staying power is thanks to his efficiency, his good housekeeping, which is all people care about. Do you agree?
The real question is: Does Boston need THIS mayor? What do you think? Should we dispense with the election charade and just hire a manager? Will that muck out the stables?
Keane says that politics is passe, and Menino's staying power is thanks to his efficiency, his good housekeeping, which is all people care about. Do you agree?
The real question is: Does Boston need THIS mayor? What do you think? Should we dispense with the election charade and just hire a manager? Will that muck out the stables?
|