Letter from Chuck Turner, Boston City Councilor, regarding the proposed expansion by Northeastern University

CALL THE BRA TODAY.........
“Let the Residents Chose the Development of Parcel 18.”
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Thursday, December 21st, at the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) board room on the 9th floor at City Hall, the BRA Board will vote on whether to approve the Northeastern University proposal to put 1,200 dormitory beds, classes, offices, and retail spaces on the corner of Ruggles and Tremont Streets, across from the Whittier Street Housing Development.

There are those in the Lower Roxbury community who support the project, including the leaders of the resident associations at Whittier Street and Alice Taylor Homes. It is also supported by Senator Wilkerson who proposed last December that Parcel 18 be used for the sighting of Northeastern University dormitory beds. Their support, I believe, is based on NU’s agreement to put a hotel on the other side of Parcel 18, the economic stimulus provided through the students at the site, and the community benefits.

While I understand their concern for economic stimulus and jobs, I believe the number of students will overwhelm the Lower Roxbury community and turn it from a residential community into an area dominated by students both on the streets and in the surrounding area that now houses families in Lower Roxbury. I also believe that this development is viewed by NU as the first step in taking over more land in the Roxbury community.

My concern that NU’s Parcel 18 proposal is the beginning of a major expansion into Roxbury is driven by the fact that NU, the Madison Park Development Corporation, and Trinity Developers are proposing 1,200 beds for Parcel 3 across street from Parcel 18. This is the same group that developed Davenport Commons, ten years ago with 600 student beds on Tremont Street a few blocks from Parcel 18.

In addition, NU is in the process of PURCHASING from Ken Guscott 36 units of family housing on Massachusetts Avenue, off of St. Botolph Street. While NU SAYS that they will honor the Section 8 rental housing subsidy agreement for an additional 17 years, NU ALSO SAYS they are NOT IN THE BUSINESS OF PROVIDING HOUSING FOR FAMILIES. Why is NU land banking additional properties in Roxbury/South End if they say their objective is to build dormitories on their campus.

However, whether you support or don’t support the proposal, I think it is critically important that you call the BRA to NOT move forward with the proposal until the NU and BRA commitment to the community is fulfilled.

Their commitment in June was that the abutters of the project and other organizations in Lower Roxbury through the Parcel 18 Task Force would be given an opportunity to choose the number of beds to be put on Parcel 18. They made this commitment given the fact that while they are proposing 1,200 beds, in February Roxbury representatives to the NU Master Planning Task Force had proposed 471 beds.

Although the commitment was made in June, there have been no meetings which have given residents a chance to examine the impacts of the two approaches and choose between them.

There have been meetings at the Whittier Street and Alice Taylor developments but there were no presentations that enabled residents to choose between the 471 proposal and the 1,200.

There have been no meetings for church parishioners of St. Cyprian’s or St. Katharine Drexyl or for residents at Madison Park Village, all of whom are abutters.

Also, there have been no meetings at the United Neighbors of Lower Roxbury, Lenox-Camden development, or Camfield Gardens which are located near the site.

I believe that as a community, we can not allow this proposal to move forward without the community residents having an opportunity to evaluate the alternative plan to make their own choice as to the number of dormitory beds and the design of the building to house them.

Haven’t we been in a forty year struggle in Lower Roxbury to assure that the perspective of the members of the community ON ANY LAND DEVELOPMENT issues are heard and valued by the public officials.

Isn’t this a right that the neighborhoods across the City are able to exercise with the cooperation of the BRA. Why not here?

If you agree with me, I urge you to call Mark Maloney, director of the BRA, at (617) 722-4300 and let him know that the BRA needs to keep its commitment to the residents of Lower Roxbury, so that they have the opportunity to be informed of the impacts, and to choose between the alternative of 471 beds or 1,200 beds.

Given the fact that the Roxbury representatives to the Task Force were willing to agree to the use of Parcel 18 for dormitory beds, the least the BRA and NU can do is to allow the residents to choose.

If you would like to discuss this issue with me further, please call (617) 635-3510. We also urge you to share with us any responses you receive from the BRA.

Sincerely,

Chuck (Turner)